Tuesday, July 20, 2010

O-scores analysis of Western States Champs

Official results are at the RMOC web page

Absolute all standings:


Absolute Women standings



By course analysis is here


As always (!) and (!!) means 7.5% and 15% above the estimate for this runner, and (?), (??) correspondingly below.Additional mark {new} shows runners whose name mentioned first time this year and therefore their score is not reliable due to lack of data.

O-scores analysis of Barebones

Official results are at the Barebones.ca

Absolute all standings:


Absolute Women standings - very interesting in comparison with official results



By course analysis is here

Interesting subset of the course analysis with Women only


As always (!) and (!!) means 7.5% and 15% above the estimate for this runner, and (?), (??) correspondingly below.Additional mark {new} shows runners whose name mentioned first time this year and therefore their score is not reliable due to lack of data.

Friday, July 9, 2010

NAOC top performers

Following table show those who improved significantly relative to their own average during the NAOC event


Runner  Class  Club Power Improvement
 Patricia Mace  F45+  QOC 52.6 47.7%
 Mark Mace  M55+  QOC 51.9 46.8%
 Oriana Riley  F-10  DVOA 25.2 46.0%
 Maxwell McWhirt  M-16  HOC 38.3 40.5%
 Lucas Lyons  M-10  ROC 66.3 38.5%
 Brian Ellis  M  GVOC 66.5 35.6%
 Sue Kuestner  F  COC 51.4 30.9%
 John Charlow  M80+  Ramblers 30.9 30.7%
 William Cusworth  M40+  COC 92.3 30.4%
 Adam Caplan-Bricker  M-18  NEOC 69.9 30.0%
 Dana Breseman  F-16  COC 61.1 30.0%
 Adeline Charles  F  FWOC 35.3 29.5%
 Jane Pataki  F65+  A/L 29.3 28.0%
 Eileen Breseman  F50+  COC 67.5 27.9%
 Rob Rapkins  M60+  Ugly Gully 78.5 26.8%
 Nicole Lennon  M  QOC 31 26.5%
 Michael Lyons  M45+  ROC 82.9 25.0%
 Rick Worner  M60+  ROC 67.4 24.9%
 Rick Breseman  M55+  COC 87.9 24.1%
 Raymond Chung  M45+  TOC 65.7 23.0%
 Linda Moore  F70+  LVOC 51.4 23.0%
 Glen Tryson  M55+  EMPO 91.5 23.0%
 Vern Nelson  M-21+  CAN 63.9 22.8%
 Heidi Cusworth  M40+  COC 49.4 21.9%
 David Yee  M45+  NEOC 75.1 21.8%
 Peggy Dickison  F50+  OK 83.5 21.2%
 Shirley Donald  F70+  KOC 43.6 21.1%
 Alex Kerr  M75+  GVOC 61.5 21.0%
 Mike Poulsen  M50+  CROC 64.7 19.5%
 Kathleen Lennon  F45+  QOC 62.9 18.0%
 Barbara Bryant  F45+  NEOC 64.5 16.9%
 Masha Konkov  F-10  BAOC 41.5 16.4%
 Liam Tasker  F  NEOC 59 15.6%
 Jonathan Rickel  M-12  TSN 59.3 14.5%
 Michael Svoboda  M50+  SLOC 63.5 14.3%
 Margaret Ellis  F60+  GVOC 67.3 13.7%
 Scott Drumm  M45+  CROC 53.1 13.2%
 Lennart Lundgren  M60+  FWOC 54.1 12.9%
 Max Lennon  M-14  QOC 59 10.3%
 Greg Chatfield  M60+  Ugly Gully 80.6 9.4%
 Kimball Forrest  M55+  ARCT 99.1 8.4%


Enjoy

O-scores version of the Björn Kjellström Cup

Following discussion at Attackpoint, here is the O-scores evaluation of the CAN/USA team efforts


(EXCEL Source file is here) and here are overall Performance list and O-speed table

Following table of runners was used, top 3 O-scores from each country, same people as in discussion above.


Runner  Class  Club LONG MIDDLE Short
 Alison Crocker  F USA 114.4 109.4
 Angelica Riley  F USA 90.8
 Carol Ross  F CAN 93.9 106.9 97.3
 Ekaterina Orekhova  F USA 96.5 90.7
 Louise Oram  F CAN 115.4 119.1 101.6
 Marie-Cat Bruno  F CAN 87.4 92.4
 Nicki Rehn  F CAN 89.8
 Samantha Saeger  F USA 112.9 107.8
 Sandra Zurcher  F USA 112.1 104
 Boris Granovskiy  M USA 128.1 127.4 120.4
 Brian May  M CAN 118.1
 Eric Bone  M USA 131.3 136.1 121.5
 Mike Smith  M CAN 141.7 143.3 125.5
 Nick Duca  M CAN 126.5 134.2
 Patrick Goeres  M CAN 140.3 133 131.9
 Ross Smith  M USA 132.3 145.4 118.6

Following table of results was compiled (plain sum of all related scores)


 Club  Class




CAN
CAN Total USA
USA Total
Values F M F M
LONG 296.7 408.5 705.2 318.1 391.7 709.8
MIDDLE 318.4 410.5 728.9 318 408.9 726.9
Short 288.7 375.5 664.2 302.5 360.5 663



2098.3

2099.7


Resulting sum of scores for each country is amazingly close (2098.3 and 2099.7)

Accuracy of the score calculation doesn't allow to call winner on the margin of 1.4 points.


What is clear is that USA ladies and Canadian men are significantly better than their corresponding rivals

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Billygoat results 1979-2010

Here is even more questionable analysis:

thanks to  times published in the convenient format at billygoat.org I made O-speed compilation of all Billygoats 1979-2010

Notice that average score for all events 1979-1999 is 50, because Billygoat is the only event available for these years and average runners by definition must have score 50.

Power at the view above is calculated using current power of the runner ( calculated within last rolling year), so evaluations do not matter much. If one goes to the event view, all powers for early years will be identical to the scores, as Billygoat currently the only event for each year before 1999.

Thursday, May 13, 2010

O-scores analysis of West point meet

Official results are on the USMAOC web page

Absolute all standings:


1.Ross Smith (M-21+), CSU *141.3*(1)
2.Boris Granovskiy (M-21+), CSU *140.2*(2)
3.Daniel Griff (M), BAOC *131.8*(3)
...
17.. Samantha Saeger (F-21+), NEOC *119.4*(17)

Absolute Women standings



Samantha Saeger (F-21+), NEOC *119.4*(1)
Jenny Arvidsson (F35+), DVOA *110.4*(2)
Erin Nielsen (F-21+), UNO *106.3*(3)

By course analysis is here

Interesting subset of the course analysis with Women only


As always (!) and (!!) means 7.5% and 15% above the estimate for this runner, and (?), (??) correspondingly below.Additional mark {new} was added recently. It shows runners whose name mentioned first time this year and therefore their score is not reliable due to lack of data.

Terrain was on average .1100-1200 GV/km (takes 11-12 minutes for 100 point runner to go through the nominal km of the race.
Examples of 100 point runners are

Steve Olafsen (M50+), UNO (99.9)
John Campbell (M50+), DVOA (99.7)

Absolute standings analysis:

All above mentioned top runners were running blue.
Top red runner was
Vadim Masalkov (M40+), DVOA *123.4*(11)

Top green runner is

Peter Gagarin (M65+), CSU *106.3*(36)

Top Brown runner is
David Cady (M65+), BFLO *87.5*(78)

Top Orange runner is

Frank Boscoe (N/A), EMPO *82.0*(86)

Top Yellow runner is

Evalin Brautigam (F-14), WCOC *81.7*(88)

Top White runner is

Peter Zakrevski (M-12), DVOA *66.8*(145)


Women standings analysis:
  
Top runners mentioned above were running mix of red and blue, so there is no way to say for sure who is best in red or blue.


Top green runner is without any doubt
Alison Campbell (F-20), DVOA *99.2*(5)



next by the O-speed core is top runner on Yellow!!!

Evalin Brautigam (F-14), WCOC *81.7*(13)


The top Brown runner is 

Janet Tryson (F55+), EMPO *73.0*(17)


Top orange runner is 

Heather Campbell (F-16), DVOA *64.6*(27)

and top white runner is

Hannah Collinsworth (F-10), ROC *30.1*(68)

Here is updated rolling A-series Women  rankings
Here is updated  rolling Men A-series Rankings

Enjoy.

P.S. Extreme performers are below:


Runner  Class  Club improve
 Eugene Frolenko  M-18  DVOA 32.9%
 John-Eric Nelson  M65+  WCOC 30.6%
 Richard Nietupski  M60+  WCOC 30.0%
 Yuri Zakrevski  M-20  DVOA 24.6%
 Mark Mace  M55+  QOC 22.4%
 Rhonda DeWeese  F55+  WCOC 21.3%
 Robert Field  M45+  QOC 18.3%
 Geoffrey Connor  N/A  HVO 18.2%
 Kean Williams  M50+  COC 15.0%
 Daniel Schaublin  M50+  HVO 14.9%
 Eric Smith  M65+  CNYO 13.8%
 Lisa Carr  F40+  NTOA 13.2%
 Evalin Brautigam  F-14  WCOC 13.0%
 Lynn Aldrich  F60+  DVOA 12.3%
 Nicolai Mejevoi  N/A  none 12.2%
 Linda Kohn  F60+  ROC 11.7%
 Candice Raines  F55+  EMPO 11.5%
 Melanie Sergiev  F-14  GMOC 11.5%
 Rick Breseman  M55+  COC 11.3%
 Nathan Collinsworth  M-10  ROC 10.5%
 Elisabeth Chiera  F75+  HVO 10.2%
 Dmitry Lavrov  M45+  HVO 10.0%
 Piotr Zielczynski  M50+  HVO -10.1%
 Karl Ahlswede  M45+  DVOA -10.8%
 Tim Parson  M50+  NEOC -10.9%
 Joan Roos  F70+  BAOC -11.0%
 Bernie Breton  N/A  HVO -11.3%
 Ed Hicks  M75+  HVO -11.5%
 Julia Zielczynska  F-14  HVO -12.4%
 Alex Bishop  M50+  QOC -12.7%
 Phil Bricker  N/A  NEOC -13.3%
 Bob Fink  M60+  DVOA -13.7%
 Michael Lyons  M45+  ROC -14.8%
 Hannah Collinsworth  F-10  ROC -15.2%
 Dan Felitsky  M35+  SDO -15.3%
 Donna Fluegel  F50+  WCOC -15.7%
 Nadezhda Popova  F60+  HVO -16.0%
 Julie Keim  F-21+  SVO -16.4%
 Brendan Shields  M-21+  CSU -18.2%
 Caroline Fleming  F45+  NEOC -20.2%
 Walter Lyons  M65+  BFLO -21.1%
 Mary Jo Childs  F55+  GMOC -21.4%
 Betsy Hawes  F65+  HVO -24.1%
 Val Duca  F40+  STARS -24.8%
 Zachary Lyons  M-14  ROC -27.4%




















































































































































































































































































Tuesday, April 27, 2010

ROC Webster park event Analysis from O-scores

Official results are at the ROC web Page

Thanks to Steve Tylock for intense communication and for providing me with data for this analysis

NOTE: Data for Orange, Yellow and White course might be not reliable due to lack of data for intermediate and beginning ROC orienteers. It will become more reliable with time


Absolute All standings


Absolute Women standings



By course analysis is here

As always (!) and (!!) means 7.5% and 15% above the estimate for this runner, and (?), (??) correspondingly below.Additional mark {new} was added recently. It shows runners whose name mentioned first time this year and therefore their score is not reliable due to lack of data.

Terrain was on average  ~900 GV/km which usually means course was fast



Here is rolling ROC Ladies Ranking  (Unofficial, incomplete O-scores version, using only data I have available now)

Men ROC rolling rankings is here   (Unofficial, incomplete O-scores version, using only data I have available now)


Top performers are below:


Runner  Class improve
 Steven Tylock  M45+ 15.1%
 Karl Kolva  M85+ 13.4%
 Robert Bundy  M65+ 12.5%
 Patricia Lyons  F55+ 11.1%
 Lucas Lyons  M-10 9.1%

Wednesday, April 21, 2010

O-Scores calculation methodology

External links:
http://www.attackpoint.org/discussionthread.jsp/message_149323 discussion about GV calculation

Original Methology post at Geocities is no longer available and I do not know where it was moved.
http://www.geocities.com/nikdangerdvm/03methods.html - original write-up of the GV algorithm calculations.

Methodology was called by many people as cumbersome and I will try to explain here in my words.
I will quote the Methodology where applicable and explain practical application details.

Originally Adapted for USOF from Wyatt Riley's BAOC ranking rules, 1999.
One more time adapted by S. Krechetov 
Definitions:  
There are four items here and they all depend on each other. Must be consumed as a whole dish. Don’t get disappointed until done reading.
  1. Runner Local Power (RLP)   = Race Gnarliness Value (GV) divided by Runners Time (RT)
RLPir = GVr /RTir; where r is running over all races (1..NR) and i is running over all runners (1.. NI)
 Example: GV is 5000, your time was 1:40:00 or 100 minutes. Your  RLP for that race is 5000/100 = 50.
  1. Runner Global Power  (RGP)   = plain average of Runner Local Power (RLP) over all races
RGPi = 1/NR*sumr(RLPir)
  1. Runners Race Difficulty (RRD) =  Runner Global Power (RGP)  multiplied by  Runners Time (RT)
RRDir = RGPi*RTr;
Example: If your RGP = 80, and your RT = 60 minutes, your RRD would be 80*60=4800
  1. Race Gnarliness Value (GV)  =  harmonic average (reciprocal of  average of reciprocal values ) of Runners Race Difficulties (RRD) for all runners in current race
1/GVr = 1/ NI *sumi(1/ RRDir);
Example:
·         John  has  RGP = 100 and runs RACE in 30 min. (RRD = 100 * 30 = 3000)
·         Mary has  RGP = 60 and runs RACE in 100 min. (RRD = 60 * 100 = 6000)
·         1/ GV = ½ (1/(100*30) + 1/(60*100)) = 1/4000
Then
·         GV = 4000

Some observations:
  • If you are on average twice as fast as somebody, you should end up with about twice their score.
Practical Implementation details.
  • Input data for the algorithm are three columns: Person, Race and Time.  No other information is needed
  • All valid finishes of the season are used. Valid finishes are times (not OT, DNF, MSP, etc...).
  • Algorithm is recursive over items 1-4. Must be stopped after next iteration changes results by negligible amount.
  • Initial conditions are Runner Local Power (RLP) which can be set to any positive nonzero number
  • Algorithm converges to the same point independently on initial conditions. For simplicity  all runners can be given RLP  = 100 at first step
  • Algorithm is linear relative to initial conditions. Meaning that if all initial  RLP are increased by factor F, the resulting GV, and RGP will be increased by the same factor.
  • The only nontrivial output of the algorithm is set of GV, which is one number per race. The rest of the results can be immediately derived from GV and Runners Times (RT)
  • At the last step, all RGP RGP, GV are normalized so that  1/ NI*sumi(RGPi) = 50 and the rest of the quantities are changed proportionally.
Additional Notes
  • Final RLPir is score of the runner for this race. Using scores one can calculate various Ranking scores. (RS) characterizing performance of particular runner in this particular discipline.
    • pick top 4 scores  and average them (No Tail)
    • pick 4 scores and half of the rest and average them (Tail)
    • pick only A meet scores and  perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • pick only A-meet Sprints and perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • Pick everything but Sprints and  perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • Pick only Extra Long races and  perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • Pick only races of this particular Color and perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • Pick only races organized by this particular club and perform Tail or No-Tail calculations
    • Pick only A meet races and only one Color of Races, perform "Tail" calculation with them (USOF scores)

All above mentioned possibilities and more are implemented in the O-scores database interface

Friday, April 16, 2010

My JWOC team evaluation

here is the announcement:
===========================================
Annoucing the 2010 USA Junior World Orienteering Championship Team:

Males

Nathaniel Lyons ROC
Andrew Childs GMOC
Carl Underwood NEOC
Greg Ahlswede DVOA
Ethan Childs GMOC - declined
Keith Andersen USMAOC

1st Alternate - John H. Williams GAOC
2nd Alternate - John Goodwin UNO


Females

Hnnah Burgess USMAOC
Alison Campbell DVOA
Holly Kuestner COC


Congratulation to all of you and the best of luck in Denmark!

Janet Porter, USA Junior Team Administrator
Jeff Saegar, USA Junior Team Coach
Scott Drumm, USOF VP of Competition
==========================================

According to the O-scores the A-meet ratings are as follows

Nathaniel Lyons ROC  (M-18), 123.8
Andrew Childs GMOC (M-18), 122.1
Carl Underwood NEOC  (M-16), 120.6
Greg Ahlswede DVOA (M-20), 116.1
Ethan Childs GMOC -(M-16), 114.8
Keith Andersen USMAOC (M-20), 110.5

1st Alternate - John H. Williams GAOC,  (M-18), 110.6
2nd Alternate - John Goodwin UNO (M-20), 108.6

So it looks like the sorted sequence is about right.
Cutoff is at level of 108.

Who is missing?

Erik Nystrom ,  (M-20),  136.8 Very solid performance, not too many races (not a citizen?)
Jaxon Rickel (M-16), at 123.7 Solid performance, not too many long races

Jordan Laughlin  (M-20), 119.0 Solid Blue performance, many races (YB 1989..)

Huw Stradling ,  (M-18), 113.2  Shaky performance, one good event year ago (West point), not too many races


I think absence of Erik Nystrom in the team is a definite big loss, but according to Drew he is not a citizen, pity.

Females:

Hannah Burgess USMAOC, (F-20), 95.9
Alison Campbell DVOA (F-20), 98.1
Holly Kuestner COC (F-20), 95.6


Potential Possibilities Missed?
Tori Borish, (F-20), 90.0

Thursday, April 15, 2010

My comment at Attackpoint to the US Middle Champs discussion

I will use this point in the discussion to promote one more time my O-scores database system for those who didn't paid enough attention to it yet.

The system allowed me to predict Jaxon as a top runner some time ago  when he had not enough meets to be A-ranked and was running orange.

O-scores is designed specially for those beginners who would like to evaluate themselves immediately and know how they stand to big guys on absolute scale. Doesn't matter what color or what level or event you are running.
I'm still waiting for feet to find time to perform a stress test which will confirm and validate system independently.

In the meantime shows that our best M-16 is still Carl Underwood with Jaxon trailing very close (~125) (link above). And also it shows that they both would beat or  match Sergey Velichko and Joseph Brautigam being top M45+'ers (also ~125) (flip age class drop down).

Of course system would require more adequate data stream from local clubs in order to notice local stars and bring them to light. I'm working with event organizers on getting the data, but so far not many of them got interested, event though all what it cost is sending me CSV SportIdent export file.
I wonder, why?

We keep saying that we need to increase population, do this and do that and at the same time refuse to take somebodie's time and efforts to "start-up" some project, even thought to many it might seem useless, but is it harmfull?

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Flying Pig Top Performers

Runner  Class  Event Score Power improve
 Noah Dixon  M-16 48.4 37.8 28.0%
 Eric Collins  M-16 51.2 41.3 24.0%
 Mathew Rogers  M-16 80.2 64.8 23.8%
 Nikolay Glukhov  M60+ 81 67.5 20.0%
 Melvin Turman  M-18 95.6 79.7 19.9%
 Tom Nolan  M55+ 101.8 85.2 19.5%
 Steve Ohrwaschel  M50+ 45.4 38.3 18.5%
 Stephen Shannonhouse  M65+ 54 45.7 18.2%
 John Barrett  M-10 54.1 46.2 17.1%
 Ricardo Martinez  M-18 69.9 59.8 16.9%
 Chris Svoboda  M50+ 84.9 72.8 16.6%
 Jeff Collins  M 49.9 43 16.0%
 Zachary Lyons  M-14 94.5 81.8 15.5%
 Mary Hamilton  F-20 74.7 64.7 15.5%
 Adam White  M-20 74.8 64.9 15.3%
 Andrew Spencer  M-18 74.6 64.8 15.1%
 Chase Thatcher  M-14 78.7 68.5 14.9%
 Michael Jones  M45+ 36.6 32.1 14.0%
 Robert Kaczorowski  M-18 57.5 50.5 13.9%
 Lucas Lyons  M-10 63.8 56.1 13.7%
 Carl Bridges  M45+ 68.5 60.9 12.5%
 Sarah Rogers  F-18 65.3 58.1 12.4%
 Tracy Whelen  F-16 69.1 61.6 12.2%
 Johnathan Brittain  M-18 48.1 43 11.9%
 Phil Martineau  M60+ 52.9 47.3 11.8%
 Louis Pataki  M65+ 32.6 29.4 10.9%
 Eric Bone  M35+ 135.5 122.2 10.9%
 Bob Lux  M60+ 103.2 93.1 10.8%
 Taylor Sneed  M-18 55.2 49.8 10.8%
 Jim Eagleton  M55+ 73.7 66.6 10.7%
 Seth Bearjar  M 38.6 34.9 10.6%
 Charlie Shahbazian  M55+ 104.4 94.5 10.5%
 Dakotah Hogan  M-18 50.9 46.1 10.4%
 Hilary Ratliff  F-16 64.3 58.3 10.3%
 Michael Howard  M-18 47.6 43.2 10.2%
 Glen Tryson  M55+ 101.9 92.5 10.2%

Monday, April 12, 2010

Flying Pig XIV analysis

Official results are at the OCIN web site

There were 32 course offered 10 first day and 11 +11 two following days
In addition to standard WYOBrGRB, there were off-color courses for IS champs. Effectivelly YOBrG were split on two.
I named standard colors as X and off-colors as Y


Here is my analysis.

Absolute All standings


Patrick Goeres (M-21+), Coureurs de Bois *148.8*(1)
Jon Torrance (M35+), OOC *137.6*(2)
Eric Bone (M35+), COC *135.4*(3)
......
Alison Campbell (F-20), DVOA *95.4*(34)

Absolute Women standings 

Alison Campbell (F-20), DVOA *95.4*(1)Corinne Porter (F-21+), DVOA *85.5*(2)
Maiya Anderson (F35+), RMOC *80.1*(3) 

By course analysis is here

Do not forget to look for interesting subset of by course analysis ( All Women )
As always (!) and (!!) means 7.5% and 15% above the estimate for this runner, and (?), (??) correspondingly below.
Additional mark {new} was added recently. It shows runners whose name mentioned first time this year and therefore their score is not reliable due to lack of data.

Terrain was on average @ 1000 GV/km (it took 10 minutes for 100 point runner to get through each nominal km of the race)

Absolute standings analysis:

Interesting is that Jaxon Rickel again was ver close to the top in absolute rankings - overall 6th place running Green.
Greg Ahlswede running Red  is the top Red runner and 7th overall

Joe Barrett (M-14), PTOC *100.3*(27) running Orange and some Green is top Orange runner and 27th overall

Alison Campbell (F-20), DVOA running Brown and some red is the top Brown runner and 34th overall

Zachary Lyons (M-14), ROC *94.4*(36) running Yellow and some Orange is top Yellow runner and 36th overall. Notice that Zach is very stable and didn't lost any point running Orange and not Yellow. This is very promising fact

Top White runner is Lucas Lyons (M-10), ROC *63.8*(128) and 128th overall


Women standings analysis:

Alison Campbell (F-20), DVOA *95.4*(1) is the fastest by far, running combination of Brown and Red. Red performance was worse than Brown, but this can not be attributed to the length of the course, as it was about the same difficulty  (GV=4200) as both browns

Top Red runner is Corinne Porter (F-21+), DVOA *85.5*(2)  and 2nd overall, almost 10 points behind Alison

Top Green runner is Elena Logvina (F40+), GHO *79.7*(4)

and 4th overall

Top Orange runner is Katie Williams (F-16), OCIN *70.7*(10) 10th overall

Top yellow runner is Nikki Singley (F-16), DVOA *65.6*(16),  16th overall
Nikki tried Orange during the event.

Top white runner Julia Doubson (F-10), BAOC *56.4*(29) was 29th overall


Here is updated Women A-series rankings
Here is updated  Men A-series Rankings

Enjoy.